Pain scores, ocular discomfort, tear production. PRK. Butterfly LASEK. “Photorefractive keratectomy showed a modest but statistically significant shorter reepithelialization time and a tendency towards lower pain scores than butterfly LASEK”
Laser eye surgeons from Sadalla Amin Ghanem Eye Hospital and the University of Joinville, in Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil; and the University of São Paulo and the State University of Campinas, in São Paulo, Brazil; evaluated fifty one patients who opted for laser refractive surgery, with one eye operated on with PRK and the other with butterfly LASEK.
The researchers from Santa Catarina and São Paulo have concluded:
“Photorefractive keratectomy showed a modest but statistically significant shorter reepithelialization time and a tendency towards lower pain scores than butterfly LASEK. The reepithelialization time was strongly associated with the duration of surgery in both techniques. A similar reduction of Schirmer test values was observed up to 1 year postoperatively in both groups.“1
The laser eye surgeons from Brazil have also noted:
- “PURPOSE: To compare corneal reepithelialization, pain scores, ocular discomfort, and tear production after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and butterfly laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK).”
- “The mean reepithelialization time in the PRK group was 4.35+/-0.48 days (range: 4 to 5 days) and 4.75+/-0.72 days (range: 4 to 6 days) in the butterfly LASEK group (P<.002).”
- “Pain scores and ocular discomfort were not statistically different between groups, although a trend towards a lower pain level with PRK was noted (3.31+/-4.09 vs 4.43+/-4.27; P=.18).”
- “Schirmer test values were significantly reduced from preoperative levels through 12 months with both PRK (23.6+/-8.1 vs 19.4+/-10.1; P<.002) and butterfly LASEK (22.4+/-8.7 vs 18.9+/-9.7; P=.01); however, no difference between groups was noted at any time.”









































