Absorbable gel implant. Non-absorbable implant. Comparison. Cataract. Glaucoma. “… phacoemulsification - deep sclerectomy (PDS) with absorbable SK-gel or non-absorbable T-flux implantation.”
- “To compare the efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification - deep sclerectomy (PDS) with absorbable SK-gel or non-absorbable T-flux implantation.”1
Researchers from Military Health Service Institute, Ophthalmology Department, Warsaw, Poland; have presented an article titled: “Combined surgery for cataract and glaucoma: PDS with absorbable SK-gel implant compared with PDS with non-absorbable T-flux implant - medium-term results.”
The researchers from Warsaw, Poland, have concluded:
- “In the case of SK-gel and T-flux application, PDS demonstrates similar efficacy and safety although the qualified success rate in the case of PDS with T-flux is significantly lower after a 24-month follow-up.”
- “The study does not indicate the cause of the observed changes but the nature of the intrascleral lake created by the implants used and its role in IOP regulation may be essential.”
The researchers from Warsaw, Poland, have also noted:
- “The study involved eyes after PDS with SK-gel (32 eyes) and T-flux (20 eyes).”
- “Primary open angle glaucoma without satisfying intraocular pressure (IOP) control (>/=21 mmHg) despite maximally tolerated medication or with progression of the visual field and cataract was the indication for surgery.”
- “The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, anterior and posterior segments of the eye, and number of antiglaucoma medications were examined.”
- “Follow-up examinations were performed on days 1 and 7, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.”
- “A complete success rate was defined as IOP </=18 mmHg without and qualified success as IOP </=18 mmHg with or without antiglaucoma medications.”
- “After a 24-month follow-up, mean IOP decreased in the SK-gel group from 20.9 +/- 6.1 to 13.8 +/- 2.1 mmHg (P = 0.000012) and in the T-flux group from 21.1 +/- 6.2 to 14.1 +/- 1.9 mmHg (P = 0.000006).”
- “There was no statistically significant difference between the number of antiglaucoma medications used in either group (P = 0.389).”
- “Complete success rates were 69.8% and 61.3%, respectively (P = 0.064) and qualified success rates were 93.2% and 84.1%, respectively (P = 0.034).”
- “There were no significant differences in complications between the two groups.”
- “Despite the obtained statistical differences between the investigated groups in the scope of the qualified success rate, the result should not be treated as reliable from a clinical point of view.”
- “The influence of the kind of implant on the obtained result and the nature of the decompression space would require confirmation by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), and by analysis of histological specimens but these were not performed.”
- “It should also be noted that the groups were not numerous.”
(1) Rękas M, Lewczuk K, Fuksińska B, Rudowicz J, Pawlik R, Stankiewicz A: Combined surgery for cataract and glaucoma: PDS with absorbable SK-gel implant compared with PDS with non-absorbable T-flux implant - medium-term results. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Mar 15; (Article in Press)
Tags: absorbable absorbable gel implant absorbable SK-gel anterior antiglaucoma antiglaucoma medications biomicroscopy cataract and glaucoma cataracts combined surgery compare comparison complications decompression deep sclerectomy eye gel eye implants eye surgery gel implant glaucoma implant indication intraocular pressure intraocular pressure control intrascleral lake IOP regulation kind of implant maximally medication medium-term Military Health Service Institute non-absorbable non-absorbable implant Ophthalmology Department phacoemulsification Poland posterior primary open angle glaucoma progression qualified segments space success rate T-flux implantation the eye tolerated ultrasound visual field Warsaw
Sphere: Related Content









































